-
1. @issue. (1997). Swatch Design Time [Electronic Version]. @issue: The Journal of Business and Design, 2. Retrieved April 10, 2006 from http://www.cdf.org/journal/0202_swatch.php.
2. @issue. (2005). Joseph M. Hogan on Design [Electronic Version]. @issue: The Journal of Business and Design, 10. Retrieved April 10, 2006 from http://www.cdf.org/journal/1001_ge.php.
3. @issue. (2006). Visual Brand Language [Electronic Version]. @issue: The Journal of Business and Design, 11. Retrieved April 10, 2006 from http://www.cdf.org/journal/1101_whirlpool.php.
4. Apple Computer. (2006). Apple Human Interface Guidelines. Retrieved April 12, 2006, from http://developer.apple.com/documentation/UserExperience/Conceptual/OSXHIGuidelines.
5. Averill, J. R., Stanat, P., & More, T. A. (1998). Aesthetics and the Environment. Review of General Psychology, 2(2), 153-174.
6. Baig, E. C. (2005). Why Are Tech Gizmos So Hard to Figure Out? [Electronic Version]. USA Today. Retrieved April 10, 2006 from http://www.usatoday.com/tech/products/2005-11-01-usability-cover_x.htm.
7. Bearden, W. O., & Etzel, M. J. (1982). Reference Group Influence on Product and Brand Purchase Decisions. Journal of Consumer Research, 9(2), 183-195.
8. Bevan, N. (2005). Cost-Benefit Framework and Case Studies. In R. G. Bias & D. J. Mayhew (Eds.), Cost-Justifying Usability: An Update for the Internet Age (pp. 575-600). Boston: Morgan Kaufmann.
9. Bickmore, T. W., & Picard, R. W. (2005 ). Establishing and Maintaining Long-Term Human-Computer Relationships. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), 12(2).
10. Black, J. (2002). Usability Is Next to Profitability [Electronic Version]. Business Week. Retrieved April 10, 2006 from http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/dec2002/tc2002124_2181.htm
11. Bolton, L. E., & Reed, A. (2004). Sticky Priors: The Perseverance of Identity Effects on Judgment. Journal of Marketing Research, 41(4), 397-410.
12. Bosert, J. L. (1991). Quality Functional Deployment: A Practitioner’s Approach. New York: ASQC Quality Press.
13. Bower, G. H., Clark, M. C., Lesgold, A. W., & Winzenz, D. (1969). Hierarchical Retrieval Schemes in Recall of Categorized Word Lists. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 8, 323–343.
14. Bradley, M. M., Codispoti, M., Cuthbert, B. N., & Lang, P. J. (2001). Emotion and Motivation I: Defensive and Appetitive Reactions in Picture Processing. Emotion, 1(3), 276–298.
15. Bringham, F. G., & Raffield, B. T. (1990). Business to Business Marketing Management. Homewood, IL: Irwin.
16. British Telecom Home Computing. (2002). Computer Users Suffer ‘PC Rage’ [Electronic Version]. MORI Poll. Retrieved April 4, 2006 from http://www.mori.com/polls/2002/bthomecomputing.shtml.
17. Brunel, F. F. (1998). The Psychology of Product Aesthetics: Antecedents and Individual Differences in Product Evaluations. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities and Social Sciences, 59(3-A).
18. BSI. (1998). BS EN ISO 9241-11:1998 Ergonomic Requirements for Office Work with Visual Display Terminals (VDTS). Part 11: Guidance on Usability. London: British Standards Institution.
19. Buss, D. M. (2004). Evolutionary Psychology: The New Science of the Mind (2nd ed.). Boston: Pearson.
20. Card, S. K., Moran, T. P., & Newell, A. (1983). The Psychology of Human-Computer Interaction. Hillsdale, N.J.: L. Erlbaum Associates.
21. Carroll, J. M. (1982). Learning, Using and Designing Command Paradigms. Human Learning, 1(1), 31–62.
22. Carroll, J. M. (1997). Human-Computer Interaction: Psychology as a Science of Design. Annual Review of Psychology, 48, 61–83.
23. Ceaparu, I., Lazar, J., Bessiere, K., Robinson, J., & Shneiderman, B. (2004). Determining Causes and Severity of End-User Frustration. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 77(3), 333-356.
24. CNN. (2003). Man Walks into a Bar, Kills Computer [Electronic Version]. CNN.com/Law Center. Retrieved April 4, 2006 from http://www.cnn.com/2003/LAW/03/07/ctv.stupid.crimes/.
25. Compaq Computer Limited UK and Ireland. (1999). Rage against the Machine [Electronic Version]. MORI Poll. Retrieved April 4, 2006 from http://www.mori.com/polls/1999/rage.shtml.
26. Cooper, A. (2004). The Inmates Are Running the Asylum. Indianapolis, IN: Sams.
27. Czerwinski, M., Larson, K., & Robbins, D. (1998). Designing for Navigating Personal Web Information: Retrieval Cues. Paper presented at the 42nd Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
28. Dan, A. (2006). Transcend Function and Focus on the Visual. Advertising Age, 77(10), 6.
29. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319.
30. Degraffenreid, S. (2006). Beyond Advertising: Why People Are the New Media. In Handbook of Business Strategy (Vol. 7, pp. 81-85). London: Emerald Group.
31. Donoghue, K. (2002). Built for Use: Driving Profitability through the User Experience. from http://www.books24x7.com/marc.asp?isbn=0071383042
32. Donovan, R. J., & Rossiter, J. R. (1982). Store Atmosphere: An Experimental Psychology Approach. Journal of Retailing, 58(1).
33. Dorsey, M. (2005). Millipore.Com: Redesign That Supports Customer Goals Drives up Sales and Traffic, Best Practices. Cambridge, MA: Forrester Research.
34. Dray, S. M. (1995). The Importance of Designing Usable Systems. Interactions, 2(1), 17-20.
35. Dreyfuss, H. (1955). Designing for People. New York: Simon and Schuster.
36. Escalas, J. E., & Bettman, J. R. (2003). You Are What They Eat: The Influence of Reference Groups on Consumers’ Connections to Brands. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 13(3), 339-348.
37. Fabris, P. (1999). You Think Tomaytoes I Think Tomahtoes [Electronic Version]. Retrieved April 10, 2006 from http://www.cio.com/archive/webbusiness/040199_nort.html.
38. Fogg, B. J. (1997). Charismatic Computers: Creating More Likable and Persuasive Interactive Technologies by Leveraging Principles from Social Psychology. Stanford, Dissertation Abstracts International, 58.
39. Fogg, B. J. (2003). Persuasive Technology: Using Computers to Change What We Think and Do. Amsterdam: Morgan Kaufmann.
40. Fogg, B. J., & Nass, C. I. (1997). Silicon Sycophants: The Effects of Computers That Flatter. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 46, 551-561.
41. Gabarro, J. (1990). The Development of Working Relationships. In J. Galegher, R. Kraut & C. Egido (Eds.), Intellectual Teamwork: Social and Technological Foundations of Cooperative Work (pp. 79–110). Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
42. Gallaway, G. (1981). Response Times to User Activities in Interactive Man/Machine Computer Systems (Technical report HFP 81-25).
43. Gartner Group. (1992). Selecting and Implementing a Systems Development Methodology. Stamford, CT: Gartner Group.
44. Gilb, T. (1988). Principles of Software Engineering Management. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
45. Gore, A. (1998). A Letter from Vice President Al Gore. Common Ground, 8(3), 1.
46. Gould, J. D., & Lewis, C. (1985). Designing for Usability: Key Principles and What Designers Think. Communications of the ACM, 28(3), 360-411.
47. Gremler, D. D., & Brown, S. W. (1999 ). The Loyalty Ripple Effect: Appreciating the Full Value of Customers International Journal of Service Industry Management, 10(3), 271-293
48. Grillon, C., Pellowski, M., Merikangas, K. R., & Davis, M. (1997). Darkness Facilitates the Acoustic Startle Reflex in Humans. Biological Psychiatry, 42(6), 453-460.
49. Hansell, S. (2004, December 27). Kodak Updates Its Brownie to Compete in a Digital Age. The New York Times, p. 67.
50. Harrison, M. C., Henneman, R. L., & Blatt, L. A. (1994). Design of Human Factors Cost-Justification Tool In R. G. Bias & D. J. Mayhew (Eds.), Cost-Justifying Usability (pp. 203-242). Boston: Academic Press.
51. Hassenzahl, M. (2004). The Interplay of Beauty, Goodness, and Usability in Interactive Products. Human-Computer Interaction, 19, 319–349.
52. Hassenzahl, M., Platz, A., Burmester, M., & Lehner, K. (2000, April 1-6). Hedonic and Ergonomic Quality Aspects Determine Software’s Appeal. Paper presented at the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems (CHI 2000), The Hague, The Netherlands.
53. Holbrook, M. B., & Moore, W. L. (1981). Feature Interactions in Consumer Judgments of Verbal Versus Pictorial Presentations. Journal of Consumer Research, 8(1), 103.
54. Human Factors International. (2001). HFI Helps Staples.Com Boost Repeat Customers by 67% [Electronic Version]. Case Studies. Retrieved April 10, 2006 from https://www.humanfactors.com/about/staples.asp.
55. Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1988). The Computer and the Mind: An Introduction to Cognitive Science. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
56. Jones, E. E. (1990). Interpersonal Perception. New York: W.H. Freeman.
57. Kalin, S. (1999). Cio Web Business Magazine [Electronic Version]. Retrieved April 10, 2006 from http://www.cio.com/archive/webbusiness/040199_use.html.
58. Karat, C.-M. (1990). Cost-Benefit Analysis of Usability Engineering Techniques. Paper presented at the Conference of the Human Factors Society 34th Annual Meeting, Orlando, FL.
59. Karat, C.-M. (2005). A Business Case Approach to Usability Cost Justification for the Web. In R. G. Bias & D. J. Mayhew (Eds.), Cost-Justifying Usability: An Update for the Internet Age (pp. 103-142). Boston: Morgan Kaufmann.
60. Karat, C.-M., & Lund, A. (2005). The Return on Investment in Usability of Web Applications In R. G. Bias & D. J. Mayhew (Eds.), Cost-Justifying Usability: An Update for the Internet Age (pp. 297-316). Boston: Morgan Kaufmann.
61. Katz, D. (1950). Gestalt Psychology: Its Nature and Significance. New York: Ronald Press Co.
62. Kemp, T. (2001). Macy’s Doubles Conversion Rate [Electronic Version]. Internet Week from http://internetweek.cmp.com/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=6402624.
63. Klein, J., Moon, Y., & Pieard, R. W. (1999, May 15-20). This Computer Responds to User Frustration. Paper presented at the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems (CHI 99), Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
64. Kurosu, M., & Kashimura, K. (1995, May 7-11). Apparent Usability Vs. Inherent Usability: Experimental Analysis on the Determinants of the Apparent Usability. Paper presented at the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems (CHI 95), Denver, Colorado.
65. Landauer, T. K. (1995). The Trouble with Computers: Usefulness, Usability, and Productivity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
66. Lang, P. J., Bradley, M. M., & Cuthbert, B. N. (1997). Motivated Attention: Affect, Activation, and Action. In P. J. Lang, R. F. Simons & M. T. Balaban (Eds.), Attention and Orienting: Sensory and Motivational Processes (pp. 97–135). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
67. Larson, K., & Czerwinski, M. (1998, April 18-23). Web Page Design: Implication of Memory, Structure and Scent for Information Retrieval. Paper presented at the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems (CHI 98), Los Angeles, CA.
68. Lauer, D. A. (1979). Design Basics New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
69. Lederer, A. L., & Prasad, J. (1992). Nine Management Guidelines for Better Cost Estimating. Communications of the ACM, 35(2), 51-59.
70. LeDoux, J. E. (1994). Emotion, Memory and the Brain. Scientific American, 270(6), 50a.
71. Madsen, K. H. (1999). The Diversity of Usability Practices. Communications of the ACM(42), 5.
72. Manning, H. (2005). Executive Q&A: Web Site Reviews. Cambridge, MA: Forrester Research.
73. Manning, H. (2006). Managing the Risk of Web Site Redesigns. Cambridge, MA: Forrester Research.
74. Manning, H. (2006). The Roi of Web Redesigns Made Simple. Cambridge, MA: Forrester Research.
75. Manning, H., McCarthy, J. C., & Souza, R. K. (1998). Why Most Web Sites Fail (No. 3-7). Cambridge, MA: Forrester Research.
76. Marcus, A. (1992). Graphic Design for Electronic Documents and User Interfaces. New York: ACM Press.
77. Mauro, C. L. (2005). Usability Science: Tactical and Strategic Cost Justifications in Large Corporate Applications. In R. G. Bias & D. J. Mayhew (Eds.), Cost-Justifying Usability: An Update for the Internet Age (pp. 265-296). Boston: Morgan Kaufmann.
78. Mayhew, D. J. (1999). The Usability Engineering Lifecycle: A Practitioner’s Handbook for User Interface Design San Diego: Morgan Kaufmann.
79. Microsoft. (2002). Windows XP Visual Guidelines. Retrieved April 12, 2006.
80. Microsoft. (2006). Windows Vista User Experience Guidelines. Retrieved April 12, 2006, from http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/UxGuide/UXGuide/Home.asp.
81. Millen, D. R. (2000). Rapid Ethnography: Time Deepening Strategies for HCI Field Research. Proceedings of the Conference on Designing Interactive Systems: Processes, Practices, Methods, and Techniques, 280-286.
82. Nakarada-Kordic, I., & Lobb, B. (2005, July 6-8). Effect of Perceived Attractiveness of Web Interface Design on Visual Search of Web Sites. Paper presented at the Conference of SIGCHI New Zealand (CHINZ 05), Auckland, NZ.
83. Nass, C., Fogg, B. J., & Moon, Y. (1996). Can Computers Be Teammates? International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 45(6), 669-678.
84. NCI. (2006). Research-Based Web Design & Usability Guidelines. Retrieved March 25, 2006, from http://usability.gov/guidelines/
85. Nielsen, J. (1993). Is Usability Engineering Really Worth It? IEEE Software, 10(6), 90–92.
86. Nielsen, J. (1994). Usability Engineering. San Diego: Morgan Kaufmann.
87. Nielsen, J. (1997). Loyalty on the Web [Electronic Version]. Alertbox. Retrieved April 10, 2006 from http://www.useit.com/alertbox/9708a.html. See also a press release describing the Binary Compass report that this Alertbox column is based on at http://merchant.bizrate.com/oa/general/press/release.xpml?rel=7.
88. Nielsen, J. (1999). Why People Shop on the Web [Electronic Version]. Alertbox. Retrieved April 10, 2006 from http://www.useit.com/alertbox/990207.html.
89. Nielsen, J., & Gilutz, S. (2003). Usability Return on Investment. Nielsen Norman Group, Fremont, CA.
90. Norman, D. A. (1987). Some Observations on Mental Models. In R. M. Baecker & W. A. S. Buxton (Eds.), Readings in Human-Computer Interaction: A Multidisciplinary Approach. San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
91. Norman, D. A. (1990). The Design of Everyday Things (1st Doubleday/Currency ed.). New York: Doubleday.
92. Norman, D. A. (2004). Emotional Design: Why We Love (or Hate) Everyday Things. New York: Basic Books.
93. Nussbaum, B. (2005). Getting Schooled in Innovation [Electronic Version]. Business Week. Retrieved April 10, 2006 from http://businessweek.com/bwdaily/dnflash/jan2005/nf2005013_8303.htm.
94. Okun, B. F. (2002). Effective Helping: Interviewing and Counseling Techniques (6th ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole-Thomson Learning.
95. Olson, G. M., & Olson, J. S. (2003). Human-Computer Interaction: Psychological Aspects of the Human Use of Computing. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 491-516
96. Pandey, J., & Singh, P. (1987). Effects of Machiavellianism, Other-Enhancement, and Power-Position on Affect, Power Feeling, and Evaluation of the Ingratiator. Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied, 121(3), 287-300.
97. Parush, A., Nadir, R., & Shtub, A. (1998). Evaluating the Layout of Graphical User Interface Screens: Validation of a Numerical Computerized Model. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 10(4), 343-360.
98. Patterson, P. A., & North, R. A. (2006). Fitting Human Factors in the Product Development Process [Electronic Version]. Medical Device & Diagnostic Industry Magazine. Retrieved April 19, 2006 from http://www.devicelink.com/mddi/archive/06/01/007.html.
99. Peter, J. P., & Olson, J. C. (1993). Consumer Behavior and Marketing Strategy. Homewood, IL: Richard D. Irwin.
100. Peters, T. J. (1987). Thriving on Chaos: Handbook for a Management Revolution. New York: Harper & Row.
101. Petroski, H. (1993). The Evolution of Useful Things. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
102. Petty, R., & Wegener, D. (1998). Attitude Change: Multiple Roles for Persuasion Variables. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The Handbook of Social Psychology (4th ed., pp. 323–390). New York: McGraw-Hill.
103. Pimentel, R. W., & Reynolds, K. E. (2004). A Model for Consumer Devotion: Affective Commitment with Proactive Sustaining Behaviors. Academy of Marketing Science Review, 2004.
104. Pine, B. J., & Gilmore, J. H. (1999). The Experience Economy: Work Is Theatre & Every Business a Stage. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
105. Pressman, R. S. (2005). Software Engineering: A Practitioner’s Approach (International ed.). Boston: McGraw-Hill Higher Education.
106. Quesenbery, W. (2003). The Five Dimensions of Usability. In M. J. Albers & B. Mazur (Eds.), Content and Complexity: Information Design in Technical Communication. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
107. Rafaeli, A., & Vilnai-Yavetz, I. (2004). Relating Instrumentality, Aesthetics, and Symbolism of Physical Artifacts to Emotions. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 5(1), 91–112.
108. Reed, A. (2002). Social Identity as a Useful Perspective for Self-Concept-Based Consumer Research. Psychology & Marketing, 19(3), 235.
109. Reeves, B., & Nass, C. I. (1996). The Media Equation: How People Treat Computers, Television, and New Media Like Real People and Places. New York: Cambridge University Press.
110. Reicheld, F. F., & Sasse, W. E. J. (1990). Zero, Defections: Quality Comes to Services. Harvard Business Review, 68(September/October), 105-111.
111. Rogers, Y., Rutherford, A., & Bibby, P. (Eds.). (1992). Models in the Mind: Theory, Perspective and Application. London: Academic Press.
112. Rohn, J. A. (2005). Cost-Justifying Usability in Vendor Companies In R. G. Bias & D. J. Mayhew (Eds.), Cost-Justifying Usability: An Update for the Internet Age (pp. 185-213). Boston: Morgan Kaufmann.
113. Root, N. L. (2005). Learning the Value of Effective Site Design. Cambridge, MA: Forrester Research.
114. Rosenberg, L. J., & Czepiel, J. A. (1984). A Marketing Approach to Customer Retention. Journal of Consumer Marketing(Spring), 45-51.
115. Rosenfeld, L., & Morville, P. (2002). Information Architecture for the World Wide Web (2nd ed.). Cambridge, Mass: O’Reilly.
116. Rubin, J. (1994). Handbook of Usability Testing: How to Plan, Design, and Conduct Effective Tests. New York: Wiley.
117. Russell, B., & Novosedlik, W. (1998). Design Matters: New iMac Apotheosis of Lateral Thinking. Strategy, 9(19), 22–23.
118. Schenkman, B. N., & Jönsson, F. U. (2000). Aesthetics and Preferences of Web Pages. Behaviour & Information Technology, 19(5), 367–377.
119. Schouten, J. W., & McAlexander, J. (1995). Subcultures of Consumption: An Ethnography of the New Bikers. Journal of Consumer Research, 22 (June), 43-61.
120. Shevlin, R. (2006). Bank Web Sites Impact Customer Relationships. Cambridge, MA: Forrester Research.
121. Special Issue on Task Analysis. (1998). Ergonomics, 41(11), 1537-1756.
122. Standish Group. (1995). The Chaos Report. West Yarmouth, MA: Standish Group.
123. Stipek, D. (1996). Motivation and Instruction. In Berliner & Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of Educational Psychology (pp. 85–113). New York: Macmillan.
124. Stone, D. L., Jarrett, C., Woodroffe, M., & Minocha, S. (2005). User Interface Design and Evaluation. San Francisco, CA: Elsevier/Morgan Kaufmann.
125. Sun Microsystems. (2001). Java Look and Feel Design Guidelines. Retrieved April 12, 2006, from http://java.sun.com/products/jlf/ed2/book/HIGTitle.html.
126. Temkin, B. D. (2005). The Customer Experience Value Chain. Cambridge, MA: Forrester Research.
127. The Open Group. (1997). CDE 2.1/Motif 2.1 – Style Guide and Glossary. from http://www.opengroup.org/public/pubs/catalog/m027.htm.
128. Tractinsky, N. (1997, March 22-27). Aesthetics and Apparent Usability: Empirically Assessing Cultural and Methodological Issues. Paper presented at the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems (CHI 97), Atlanta, Georgia.
129. Tractinsky, N., Katz, A. S., & Ikar, D. (2000). What Is Beautiful Is Usable. Interacting with Computers, 13 127-145.
130. Tullis, T. S. (1983). The Formatting of Alphanumeric Displays: A Review and Analysis. Human Factors, 25(6), 657-682.
131. Turner, J. C. (1985). Social Categorization and the Self-Concept: A Social Cognitive Theory of Group Behavior. In E. J. Lawler (Ed.), Advances in Group Processes: Theory and Research (Vol. 2, pp. 77–121). Greenwich , CT: JAI Press.
132. User Interface Engineering. (2001). Are the Product Lists on Your Site Reducing Sales? Bradford, MA: User Interface Engineering.
133. van der Heijden, H. (2003). Factors Influencing the Usage of Websites: The Case of a Generic Portal in the Netherlands. Information & Management, 40(6), 541-549.
134. Veryzer Jr., R. W. (1993). Aesthetic Response and the Influence of Design Principles on Product Preferences. Advances in Consumer Research, 20(1), 219-223.
135. Vredenburg, K., Mao, J.-Y., Smith, P. W., & Carey, T. (2002 ). A Survey of User-Centered Design Practice. Paper presented at the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems (CHI 02), Minneapolis, Minnesota.
136. Wertheimer, M. (1938). Laws of Organization in Perceptual Forms. In W. D. Ellis (Ed.), Source Book of Gestalt Psychology (pp. 71-88). London: Kegan Paul.
137. Wiklund, M. E. (1994). Usability in Practice: How Companies Develop User-Friendly Products. Boston, MA: Academic Press.
138. Wildstrom, S. (1998, September 7). Is Apple’s iMac for You? Business Week, 18.
139. Wixon, D., & Jones, S. (1996). Usability for Fun and Profit: A Case Study of the Design of Dec Rally, Version 2. In M. Rudisill & C. Lewis (Eds.), Human-Computer Interface Design: Success Stories, Emerging Methods, and Real-World Contex (pp. 3-35). San Francisco: Morgan Kaufman.
140. Wixon, D., & Ramey, J. (Eds.). (1996). Field Methods Casebook for Software Design. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
141. Yamamoto, M., & Lambert, D. R. (1994). The Impact of Product Aesthetics on the Evaluation of Industrial Products. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 11, 309–324.
142. Zaccai, G. (2005). Designed for Loving [Electronic Version]. Business Week. Retrieved April 10, 2006 from http://www.businessweek.com/innovate/content/jul2005/di20050721_304729.htm.
143. Zajonc, R. B., & Markus, H. (1982). Affective and Cognitive Factors in Preferences. Journal of Consumer Research, 9(2), 123–132.
-
- User Research
- UX Requirements
- UX Design
- UX Evaluation
- Integration
Business Objectives - Who Uses UXE?
- Why Use UXE?
- Increasing Sales
- Enhancing Productivity
- Decreasing Costs
- Reducing Risk